The preliminary estimate remains 47.021 credits. No methodology-specific equations, deductions, or issuance adjustments are currently persisted, so this selection does not recalculate the quantity.
STAGE 02 · METHODOLOGY DETAILS
Livestock Project Protocol Review
North Ridge Dairy
Map this candidate rulebook to North Ridge evidence and identify which requirements are internally supported versus externally conditional.
Market lifecycle and accounting handoff
Move from market selection through external issuance, then hand issued credits into inventory.
Applicability position
Registry and methodology
- REGISTRY
- Climate Action Reserve CAR
- METHODOLOGY ID
- CAR-LIVESTOCK-REVIEW
- PROJECT ACTIVITY
- Livestock manure methane management
- INTERNAL STATUS
- Candidate
- FACILITY SELECTION
- Selected
Why this method is being reviewed
Review Climate Action Reserve protocols covering livestock manure treatment, methane capture, destruction and monitoring.
What the rulebook must establish
These categories organize the detailed applicability review without inventing protocol-specific conclusions.
Confirm the facility activity, geography, monitoring period, and project boundary fit the protocol.
Establish the defensible baseline and demonstrate that the reduction is beyond business-as-usual and required practice.
Identify the protocol equations, deductions, uncertainty treatment, and eligible claimed quantity before any pathway adjustment is implemented.
Map required measurements, calibration, record retention, data quality, and monitoring frequency to North Ridge evidence.
Identify the records an independent verifier must reproduce before the package can proceed to registry review.
Internal evidence mapping
Facility code and facility name are available.
61 carbon ledger records are available.
47.021 estimated credits are available.
Average data quality is 100.0%.
No draft accounting records remain.
61 ledger records meet the current internal eligibility rules.
Selected registry: Climate Action Reserve.
Selected methodology: Livestock Project Protocol Review.
The selected methodology is currently a valid candidate for internal review.
All configured registry-specific requirements are satisfied.
How internal evidence status is determined
Internal satisfaction means the application located the configured facility, ledger, data-quality, readiness, registry, or methodology evidence. It does not replace formal protocol interpretation or third-party verification.
External confirmation required
The baseline scenario must be validated against the selected methodology and project circumstances.
Additionality must be demonstrated using the tests required by the applicable protocol.
The project activity must be confirmed as exceeding applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Methane capture, destruction, avoidance, and project-boundary eligibility must be confirmed against the actual protocol.
An approved independent verifier must reproduce and approve the claimed result before registry approval.

